<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
 <title type="text">SHRIPHANI PALAKODETY: Posts tagged 'buzzfeed'</title>
 <link rel="self" href="http://blog.shriphani.com/feeds/buzzfeed.atom.xml" />
 <link href="http://blog.shriphani.com/tags/buzzfeed.html" />
 <id>urn:http-blog-shriphani-com:-tags-buzzfeed-html</id>
 <updated>2016-05-07T07:27:59Z</updated>
 <entry>
  <title type="text">Consuming News: 2016</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.shriphani.com/2016/05/07/consuming-news-2016/?utm_source=buzzfeed&amp;utm_medium=Atom" />
  <id>urn:http-blog-shriphani-com:-2016-05-07-consuming-news-2016</id>
  <published>2016-05-07T07:27:59Z</published>
  <updated>2016-05-07T07:27:59Z</updated>
  <author>
   <name>SHRIPHANI PALAKODETY</name></author>
  <content type="html">&lt;html&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quartz has a new news app - an absolute peach.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/img/qz_screenie.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The NYTimes in comparison is a brain-dump.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/img/times_screenie.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a kid, in the pre-WWW days, people around me consumed news in the following forms (I couldn&amp;rsquo;t be bothered):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;30 minute segments thrice a day on a popular TV network.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Newspaper covering stuff from a time-period between last week and 2:00 am this morning.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;24 hour news on TV.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The WWW presented a challenge (and still does) for traditional news orgs. I believe all content gets 2 kinds of eyeballs - the kind of folk who are looking for exactly that content and the kind who are bored and will watch whatever is on. When a TV producer sets up a narrative for a day&amp;rsquo;s worth of programming, you get the attention of both these groups - there are few other options.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In an on-demand world, long-form news that is hastily put together needs to compete with youtube videos, reddit and so on. Converting a narrative of events into a blob of text you can put on your site is going to attract only the kind of people who want to read this sort of stuff in their spare time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my experience this species loves the color beige and has the world-view of prep-school headmasters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And to capture and lock down this audience, you are forced to convert journalism into a weird vaudeville performance. In fact The Daily Show ended up becoming a meta-news org making fun of this phenomenon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As print journalism and 24 hour news orgs die, I see 2 main vehicles for news consumption emerging:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Breaking news outside traditional media cycles - plane crashes, etc. This is stuff that will go viral on social media before a reporter arrives at the site.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Breaking news within traditional media cycles. A presidential candidate&amp;rsquo;s decision to drop out of a race will typically be leaked to the NYTimes or some other established organization.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;A stream of news delivered thrice a day - possibly personalized since people don&amp;rsquo;t enjoy their senses being assaulted with information all the time. The new Quartz app (I think) fits this space nicely. The NYTimes has an app called &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/nytnow/"&gt;NYTNow&lt;/a&gt; but it isn&amp;rsquo;t clear to me if the feed is personalized at all. Given that the service has a &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/NYTNow"&gt;twitter presence&lt;/a&gt;, it is entirely possible that there is zero personalization.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Long form analysis with amazing visualizations. This sort of stuff requires expertise along several dimensions - something I&amp;rsquo;ve seen the NYTimes excel at. They produced this brilliant piece &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/29/upshot/money-race-and-success-how-your-school-district-compares.html"&gt;on school districts&lt;/a&gt;, this &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2013/08/18/reshaping-new-york/"&gt;exceptional piece on Michael Bloomberg&amp;rsquo;s tenure as mayor&lt;/a&gt; and this beautiful piece on the &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2013/07/21/silk-road/"&gt;silk road&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This leaves us with how to make $$.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t think breaking news is a serious vehicle to make money (anymore). However existing media shops need to invest in this space to maintain an aura of legitimacy. This might change in the future but today&amp;rsquo;s expectations of a news org include breaking news. It might be ok for a newer media org to become purely an analysis-based-reporting organization (like Nate Silver&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/"&gt;http://fivethirtyeight.com/&lt;/a&gt;), but I would still like the news app to alert me when something serious happens (like the Paris attacks) and not have to discover this on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quartz has been delivering small ads in the news stream that look like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/img/qz_ad_screenie.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like these sorts of ads - they aren&amp;rsquo;t intrusive (well, for now) and possibly get you more impressions than whatever the status quo is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are 2 additional examples I want to cover. &lt;a href="http://www.tomonews.com/"&gt;TomoNews&lt;/a&gt; is an incredibly creative news org. The animated shorts are rather entertaining.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FBvPSHTAGbE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BuzzFeed has mastered the art of bringing people to their site, creating a stable revenue stream from their baity content and produce some &lt;a href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/williamalden/how-high-flying-zenefits-fell-to-earth"&gt;very&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/williamalden/tumblr-has-lost-almost-a-quarter-of-its-value-under-yahoos-o?utm_term=.gnxYeNdJl#.tfPe42NGR"&gt;nice&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/this-tory-donor-was-secretly-filmed-dropping-cash-stuffed-ru?utm_term=.kbWYgBLR2#.nrzm1A9D5"&gt;long-form&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/markschoofs/jaw-dropping-investigations-we-published-in-2015?utm_term=.kcWdkpNwE#.jrvGZoEkK"&gt;news articles&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To survive, journalism needs to change. There are new gatekeepers, new platforms and new competitors. News needs to change from a brain-dump to a new kind of performance art. Existing media powerhouses have several weapons in their war chest - a brand-name that resonates well, existing relationships with the rich and powerful, and revenue streams (they might be dwindling but at least they&amp;rsquo;re around).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This soft-power needs to mix with the best photography, web-design, typography and visualization-tech. Each piece of investigative journalism should become a distinct, pleasant memory - like when Walter Cronkite covered the moon landings:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_3vVjyqkwrw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In short, give people something they will enjoy for a reasonable price.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</content></entry></feed>