<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
 <title type="text">SHRIPHANI PALAKODETY: Posts tagged 'eigenvalues'</title>
 <link rel="self" href="http://blog.shriphani.com/feeds/eigenvalues.atom.xml" />
 <link href="http://blog.shriphani.com/tags/eigenvalues.html" />
 <id>urn:http-blog-shriphani-com:-tags-eigenvalues-html</id>
 <updated>2015-01-16T02:13:37Z</updated>
 <entry>
  <title type="text">Multidimensional Scaling and PCA are the Same Thing</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.shriphani.com/2015/01/15/multidimensional-scaling-and-pca-are-the-same-thing/?utm_source=eigenvalues&amp;utm_medium=Atom" />
  <id>urn:http-blog-shriphani-com:-2015-01-15-multidimensional-scaling-and-pca-are-the-same-thing</id>
  <published>2015-01-16T02:13:37Z</published>
  <updated>2015-01-16T02:13:37Z</updated>
  <author>
   <name>SHRIPHANI PALAKODETY</name></author>
  <content type="html">&lt;html&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a very simple argument that shows that MDS and PCA achieve the same results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This argument has 2 important components. The first of these shows that an eigendecomposition of a gram matrix can be used for dimension-reduction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PCA leverages the singular value decomposition (SVD). Given a matrix $ X $, the SVD is $ X = USV^{T} $.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We drop columns from X by using $ US_{t} $ where we drop some rows and columns from S.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is also conviently obtained using an eigendecomposition of the covariance matrix.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Working with the gram matrix, we have $ XX^{T} $ and when expressed in terms of $ U $, $ S $ and $ V $, we have $ XX^{T} $ = $ (USV^{T})(VSU^{T}) $.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simple algebra tells us that this is equal to $ US^{2}U^{T} $. The &lt;a href="http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee127a/book/login/l_sym_sed.html"&gt;spectral theorem&lt;/a&gt; tells us that this the eigendecomposition of the gram matrix will return this decomposition. $ U $ and $ S $ can be retrieved and a dataset with fewer dimensions can be obtained.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The second part of the argument involves proving that a matrix of distances is indeed a gram matrix. This argument was discussed in a &lt;a href="http://blog.shriphani.com/2014/11/02/powerful-ideas-in-manifold-learning/"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</content></entry></feed>